Creative COW SIGN IN :: SPONSORS :: ABOUT US :: CONTACT US
BLOGS: My COW BlogMacWorldEditingTechnologyAfter EffectsFinal CutEntertainment

adam taylor's Blog

Pity the Poor Corporate Suits....


I'm sure we've all been there...cut a great piece that everyone was happy with only to have it rejected by some nameless faceless corporate suit sat in some rat hole of a high rise hell. No reason given or needed - just that he represents the licensing company and is in a bad mood...

Well it happened to me today.

As you probably already guessed.

I try not to let these things annoy me...but they do. I can take constructive criticism and even destructive criticism if the point made is a valid one. But not when the only reason is because they can.

So i made the changes, not enough though....so another round of changes, the edit becomes so much less effective, and eventually the suit is happy.

At home i have a good old rant, telling my beloved about this "corporate worm" and his unreasonable requests.

"You've got to feel sorry for them" I am told. WHAT???

"Well if i had to spend all day looking at work others had created, trying to find fault so as to bring some meaning to my own pitiful existence, then i must be a really unpleasant and unhappy person with no creative outlet of my own."

Wow! My wife is brilliant. She really hit the nail on the head with that observation. I still want to beat the guy to a pulp, but at least i could in all conscience feel a little pity for him whilst i was doing it.

And tomorrow, when i hear he's still not happy, and the entire ad campaign gets shifted back a week because he did not like a sound effect somewhere in the background (I kid you not!), then i shall think of those wise words and hope that someday he finds happiness, smug in the knowledge that i am getting paid to do something creative, that i love doing, and that leaves me with a warm smug cosy feeling ....just before posting it off for another round of corporate creative assasinations!

(how many s's in that word? every variation looks wrong)


Posted by: adam taylor on Aug 14, 2007 at 10:04:19 pm Comments (4) television

Comments:
Life among the suits
by Tim Wilson on Aug 13, 2007

Even though I've never worked with "suits" who actually wear suits, I'm familiar with another aspect of the dynamic.

If you don't put some stamp on a project, something that is identifiably yours, no matter how small, then you're sending the message that you aren't necessary. You're a step away from getting laid off.

I'm not kidding. This may be the most dominant dynamic driving corporate life in the 21st century. Not that you can blame anybody for trying to keep their job.

Maybe they're very good at other aspects of their job, but unless you have something to contribute all the time, you're replaceable. Or so the logic goes.

Since nobody likes a yes man, you have to be a NO man if you want to keep your job.

It sucks for anyone downstream, but I gotta tell you, it's even MORE frustrating if you're in house. You know The Big Fight is coming, maybe just The Big Favor, so you have to keep your powder dry until you really, really need it. It means that you suck it up and put your name on work that you hate.

The frustration is knowing that the team effort should be for the good of the project. It's not even that "the boss always wins," because a whoooooole lot of these projects are undertaken by peers from different teams. They ask, what gives you the standing to tell me my idea isn't good/good enough, whatever? And the answer is, well, I don't have any standing at all, but this is why I say it....

It's the nature of consensus to sink to the lowest common denominator. High-impact efforts are rarely possible. The stakes are too high -- get shot down by the bosses a couple of times, and you no longer have any weight with them OR your peers. A new boss comes in, and the laser sight is between your eyes for a whole new batch of reasons.

Any similarity to any company of any size currently undergoing reorganization is strictly coincidental.

But this is also said in full sympathy. Decisions that look arbitrary re: creative decisions may in fact be artbitrary re: creativity....but not at all arbitrary for very real needs....that have little to do with the job at hand.

If you're a contractor, your longevity depends on smiling as you take the money. It's harder than it sounds, but it's a whole lot easier from the outside, trust me.

Sounds like a grim Monday observation, but from this side of the fence, hap hap happy!

Enjoy the dough. Feel free to spend it all in one place if you want. LOL

 

if only....this one is not a
by adam taylor on Aug 13, 2007
just discovered its real awkward to remove a double post - hence this banal sentence!
if only....this one is not a
by adam taylor on Aug 13, 2007
if only....this one is not a case of being able to communicate with the person involved. He's protected behind an impenetrable shield of.... well i don't really know what, but i have a good idea! . These are worldwide conglomerate licensing dept types.  You know the sort - pay them a fortune for the rights to use the licence on a product, pay them a fortune in royalties when product sells well, want to use a voice that sounds a bit like one of the characters - pay us even more money even though its not the character. Want to establish some kind of connection with the licence - regardless of how tenuous - NOT A CHANCE. An ever downward spiral into gloom, despair and two dimensional thought..

They don't seem to realise if you can make the ad actually tie the licence and the product together, more people are likely to connect the two and if the product is good - maybe even buy it. Then every one benefits.
What you have to remember is....
by Christian Glawe on Aug 11, 2007

 

In the world of corporate communications (and also a lot of ad agency work), that "suit" that you're working with probably has *another* "suit" above him... whom *he* has to please.

I'll wager that your suit probably has a similar conversation with *his* wife about what a jerk his boss is for reworking the concept, screwing with the edit, etc.

Two things to remember:

Dude is writing the checks - he gets the cut he wants.  Period.

Buuuuuttttt... dude *cannot* tell you how many versions of the project to save... I don't see a problem with asking the guy "do you mind if I put this on my reel?"... and, if he says, "sure... as long as you wait til after it airs", you can put whichever version on the demo you like - although I'd probably notate it as "(adam's cut)", or in some other way communicate that it wasn't the final, as aired version.

 

"Pain is temporary... film is forever"

Christian Glawe

editor/compositor

www.ChristianGlawe.com

Login to Comment
adam taylor

adam taylor


Video Editor, Dubbing Editor/Mixer, Motion Graphics, and a whole lot more besides!
Blog FeedRSS


FORUMSTUTORIALSMAGAZINEDVDsBOOKSPODCASTSEVENTSSERVICESNEWSLETTERNEWSBLOGS

© CreativeCOW.net All rights are reserved.

[Top]