Creative COW SIGN IN :: SPONSORS :: ABOUT US :: CONTACT US
BLOGS: My COW BlogMacWorldEditingTechnologyAfter EffectsFinal CutEntertainment

Peter Ralph's Blog

Working inside the box


Moving from photo to video is similar to going from first class to coach.

You find you have a lot less wriggle room.

The video box is a much tighter fit. Photoshop puts cropping and scaling tools into the hands of every photographer, and most use them freely. Very few photographs reach the client without some finessing of color and framing. Cartier Bresson's insistence that cropping should be done in camera seems somewhat quaint.

Videographers enjoy no such flexibility. The pixels captured by the camera have a one-to-one relationship with the pixels displayed on the TV. Cropping and upscaling a video image by even 10% produces a significantly degraded image.

Swapping still cameras for video means going back to the days of Cartier Bresson and paying meticulous attention to framing, we need every single pixel.More...

Unfortunately prosumer video cameras (most all video cameras under $10K) do not show all the pixels in the viewfinder. Viewfinders and LCDs typically overscan the image, in the same way as TVs. This means that they do not display the full image - often only 90% of the image recorded to tape is viewable in the viewfinder or LCD. The technical rationale for overscanning has disappeared but most modern TV sets overscan, HDTV units included.

The amount of overscan in modern sets varies, and video displayed on computer screens "underscans" which means every pixel is visible. Looking at the picture above - in the viewfinder of your digital video camera you will see the portion of the picture inside the red frame, whereas a growing number of viewers will be able to see the whole image.

It's difficult to shoot inside the box when you don't know how big the box is.

Solutions

The first step is to connect your camera up to a laptop or pro monitor (with underscan) and determine the amount of overscan. Some cameras, the Sony Z1 for instance, do provide an underscan option in some shooting modes. Engaging underscan will reduce the size of the image, so recommended practice would often be to just use underscan periodically to check the image.

Shooting in a studio the main gotcha is the boom mic creeping in to the top of the frame. This footage will fail most broadcast specs. Clients won't be over-impressed either. With a locked down camera and a bland out of focus background it may be possible to fix this in post. For FinalCutPro CHV have a clone plugin that makes the fix quite simple.

Shooting VJ style, handheld run and gun, the problems are more likely to occur and they will almost always be impossible to fix in post.

The first thing to be aware of is the mic. On smaller cameras mounting a shotgun mic with a fuzzy wind buster will cause problems. Both Rycote and Lightwave market extenders to isolate the mic from the camera. These gizmos are really designed to reduce the possibility of the mic picking up camera noise but also work well for moving the fuzzy out of the frame.

Avoid strong vertical line near the side edges of the frame or horizontal lines near the top or bottom.Watch the foreground particularly. Shooting handheld those lines will make camera movement much more distracting. The same goes for any high-contrast object that is shifting in and out of the frame.

Shooting run and gun without underscan it is imperative to shoot with both eyes open.

Many shooters prefer to shoot with a viewfinder rather than an LCD screen - one eye for the camera image and one for the scene. With practice it is possible to shift focus from one eye to the other without effort.

Whether shooting with a viewfinder or an LCD - remember that neither one is giving you the full picture.


Posted by: Peter Ralph on Jul 30, 2007 at 2:17:43 pm Comments (2) digital photography

Real Player - Ahoy!


Real Networks today announced the public beta release of Real Player 11. The player allows users to download any web video in all major formats. Multiple videos can be downloaded in the background as you continue surfing. The videos are then placed into a desktop application where they can be organized into playlists and burned to CD. The pro upgrade allows burning to DVD.

Although the player will recognize and respect DRM restrictions the player will strip the video from the contextual advertising commonly used by Youtube, Brightcove etc. causing many to accuse Real of piracy. Real insists that the product does not break any copyright law.

Lawyer Laurence Pulgram, partner in the copyright litigation group at Fenwick & West LLP in San Francisco, agrees, saying RealNetworks has managed to stay within copyright laws that cover such devices as VCRs. "This is pretty close to the paradigm example of a VCR-type device," Pulgram said. "It has substantial non-infringing uses." Information Week

The Real desktop application includes a video search application provided by blinkx.

"Previous versions of RealPlayer have only had access to RealNetworks' small library of video content but the deal with Blinkx will offer the media player's users access to around 12 million hours of content.....Blinkx provides the critical link between the consumer and the fragmented online content industry. Unlike other text-based technologies that use often misleading text tags attached to the descriptions of videos, Blinkx's platform can comprehend what is in the video clip and thus deliver more accurate results to the user." The Independent

The player is currently windows only - mac version later in the year. For more on Blinkx see Web video that works part 2 below, and video interviews on BeetTV

Posted by: Peter Ralph on Jun 27, 2007 at 9:30:04 am Comments (0) web

Videojournalism as it happens


Ben Hammersley has written 2 books on RSS syndication. He introduced blogging to the Guardian, invented the term "podcasting", and is a talented photographer. His latest gig is with the BBC - he is currently en route to Istanbul to create a 30 minute documentary covering the political climate in Turkey and the upcoming elections. The documentary will air July 11th.

Behind the scenes videos covering the entire process in detail will be posted on his youtube page.

[BONUS LINK] from BH's twitter - the BBC's fifteen web principles.

via: shootingbynumbers.com


Posted by: Peter Ralph on Jun 19, 2007 at 11:44:51 am Comments (1) television, web authoring

The REALLY big picture


Seadragon/photosynth - an incredible visual viewing/modelling/networking app - from Microsoft. Very classy of BMW to leave their ad until after the presentation.

bit of trouble embedding the video so meantime. Check it out here


Posted by: Peter Ralph on Jun 6, 2007 at 6:54:01 am Comments (0) digital photography, technology, websites

Real blogs for beginners.


I mean real beginners. If you have been blogging longer than a week or so please move along there is nothing for you here, you already know this stuff.

Actually I've been blogging a lot longer than a week. But all the blogs I have built in the past have essentially been marketing fluff - blogs designed to promote the idea that you are a great company staffed by real people who care about the same things as your clients do.

This model has become very popular especially since the publication of Lovemarks: The Future Beyond Brands by Saatchi CEO Kevin Roberts. Nothing wrong with the model - I maintain several blogs in that genre.

But there is another model altogether where the blog itself is the product.

Just about all the blogs on the Technorati top 100 follow this "real blog" model.

Some are just online diaries that generate no income. Others like girl with a one track mind start off that way and then turn into real blogs.

For me the two quintessential examples of real blogs are Ken Rockwell's photography site and Hugh Mcleod's gapingvoid. The two sites are very different from one another.

Ken Rockwell dishes out some of the most valuable and reliable photography advice (mostly nikon DSLRs) that you can find at any price. And his site is free! All he asks is that when you buy your equipment you do it through the links on his site. I guess it works. Both he and his wife have given up their jobs to spend more time with their new baby.

I should mention technically Ken's site is not a blog at all, it's a very basic html website, but it functions exactly like a blog without the comments. What is important is that he updates it a lot and the new stuff is at the top, so it's a blog. Why doesn't he use blog software? I have no idea.

gapingvoid started as a blog to showcase Hugh Mcleod's "cartoons on the back of business cards". The cartoons are still a prominent part of the site - but gapingvoid experienced explosive growth after the seminal "Hughtrain manifesto: how to be creative".

Hugh works in the UK where he gets a lot of attention from the mainstream media and has several prominent clients. Microsoft recently signed on to his Blue Monster jag.

Hugh's blog is kind of the studio 54 for the blogging cognoscenti. The people leaving comments (along with their blog addresses) are the folks behind the rope. The people Hugh blogs about are the folks inside the club.

So that's it. Real blogs for real people, or the other type of blogs, "for when you want to give people the illusion that you care." (Sam Kinison)

Posted by: Peter Ralph on May 31, 2007 at 5:22:20 pm Comments (4) blogs

Videojournalism - the first 5 rules


1. "Be in the right place at the right time" aka The Zapruder Rule. If you can stay on the right side of this rule you can ignore many of the others. However much TV photographers howl there is a compelling logic to the notion that for breaking news coverage the quantity of camera crews you field can often be as important as the quality.
2. "If your pictures aren't good enough, you're not close enough" - Robert Capa. This has metaphorical as well as literal significance for journalists. The more immersed you are in the subject the better the story - authenticity and commitment. Read Capa's wiki for clues as to what made him the 20th century's pre-eminent photojournalist.
3. The right camera is the one you have in your hands when you need it. Would Abraham Zapruder have got more money for his footage if he'd had a 35mm camera instead of an 8mm Bell & Howell? Possibly. But $16,000,000 for 24 seconds of footage works out at $700K per second. Why quibble? If you still aren't convinced go read Ken Rockwell.
4. Learn to shoot without a tripod. Even if you have the time and the space confining the camera to a tripod is a crippling restriction. Ten years ago no-tripod was a sure sign of an amateur, today the situation is reversing. Movies like Children of men, and Lords of Dogtown are creating an aesthetic that sets us free. So what do I do with my $2000 Vinten? I use it of course! Just because we've been set free doesn't mean we have to run round naked all the time. Nice to know we can do it when we want to though.
5. Rule 5 contains material of a graphic and somewhat shocking nature – so I’ll leave it until next time.

Posted by: Peter Ralph on May 24, 2007 at 3:42:45 pm Comments (0) digital photography, television, documentaries

Peter Ralph

Originally from LA, Peter grew up in London, and lived in France, South Africa and India before returning to the US. He now lives in the ski-mountains west of Denver with wife Stephanie, son Noah (14), five horses, 3 cats and 2 dogs.

After many years working in TV, since 2005 Peter has been a freelance video producer/consultant.


Blog FeedRSS


FORUMSTUTORIALSMAGAZINEDVDsBOOKSPODCASTSEVENTSSERVICESNEWSLETTERNEWSBLOGS

© CreativeCOW.net All rights are reserved.

[Top]